3 ms·
The relevant section seems to be NOTE: ON THE BORDER QUESTION, SADDAM REFERRED TO THE 1961 AGREEMENT AND A "LINE OF PATROL" IT HAD ESTABLISHED. THE KUWAITIS, H
by Pinckney 16y ago
The relevant section seems to be
NOTE: ON THE BORDER QUESTION, SADDAM REFERRED
TO THE 1961 AGREEMENT AND A "LINE OF PATROL" IT
HAD ESTABLISHED. THE KUWAITIS, HE SAID, HAD TOLD
MUBARAK IRAQ WAS 20 KILOMETERS "IN FRONT" OF THIS
LINE. THE AMBASSADOR SAID THAT SHE HAD SERVED IN
KUWAIT 20 YEARS BEFORE; THEN, AS NOW, WE TOOK NO
POSITION ON THESE ARAB AFFAIRS.
Which I suppose can be read as the US taking no position on Iraq-Kuwait affairs at all, but given the context it seems to me to refer only to the statement by the Kuwaitis to Mubarak that Iraqi troops were too close to the border. If Saddam is asserting this is a lie, then the US response may only refer to the US not taking a position on these statements.
Or, to conclude, I would really like to hear confirmation or refutation by someone more familiar with the history or with experience in diplomatic matters.