4 ms·
That is still the same order of magnitude. $5T would be "wildly off"... And you must concede that even "only" a $170B reduction in medical costs could change
by jachee 7y ago
That is still the same order of magnitude.
$5T would be "wildly off"...
And you must concede that even "only" a $170B reduction in medical costs could change the entire market.
- Retric 7y agoAs I said it’s not a difference in net costs of 170B. It may cost 20$ to eat out at lunch, but the alternative is not skipping eating. So the net cost for eating out is the delta between my options. Random study: Results Smoking was associated with a greater mean annual healthcare cost of €1600 per living individual during follow-up. However, due to a shorter lifespan of 8.6 years, smokers’ mean total healthcare costs during the entire study period were actually €4700 lower than for non-smokers. For the same reason, each smoker missed 7.3 years (€126 850) of pension. https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/2/6/e001678 https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/2/6/e001678.