4 ms·

Definitely artifacts in the equipment. In one article I have read about the navy pilots, it stated that reports increased greatly after the the equipment was '

Definitely artifacts in the equipment. In one article I have read about the navy pilots, it stated that reports increased greatly after the the equipment was 'upgraded'. I also believe that these increased numbers of reports are an attempt to denigrate/disinform reports of newer secret aircraft as happened when previous secret aircraft happened to hit the news. "A-12 (60-6926 / 123). This aircraft was the third A-12 built, the second to fly, and the first to crash. On 24 May 1963, ..... the pilot ejected safely. The wreckage was recovered in two days and persons at the scene were identified and requested to sign secrecy agreements. A cover story for the press described the accident as occurring to an F-105."

krapp 7y ago
>In one article I have read about the navy pilots, it stated that reports increased greatly after the the equipment was 'upgraded'. >I also believe that these increased numbers of reports are an attempt to denigrate/disinform reports of newer secret aircraft as happened when previous secret aircraft happened to hit the news. I can buy one or the other, but both implies that these artifacts were introduced deliberately in order to increase the number of UFO reports from Navy pilots in order to obfuscate public awareness of possible sightings of unrelated secret aircraft.