13 ms·
> Edit: The metric they use for that may be slightly different as they put US commutes at 48.8 minutes per day. At which point 2 EU countries have worse commute
by vonmoltke 7y ago
> Edit: The metric they use for that may be slightly different as they put US commutes at 48.8 minutes per day. At which point 2 EU countries have worse commutes. Hungary and Romania. If the daily average for the US was 27x2 = 54 minutes that’s worse than very EU country.
It's the same method, the CNBC article is just using the more recent survey, so their number is 10 years newer than the one in that report. This, comparing to the non-US numbers in it is not fair.
> That’s terrible by EU standards or Canadian (24 minutes each way) standards
I don't agree with your definition of "terrible" in the relative sense. Daily, the US number in that report is only 2 minutes higher than the Netherlands, 6 minutes higher than Germany, and 7 minutes higher than Belgium. All three are over 40 minutes per day, so IMO if the US time is "terrible" so are theirs. Ditto the Canadian number, which is only 6 minutes per day less.
- Retric 7y agoIt takes a lot to move an average by even one percent across millions of people. Look at a chart of say life expectancy across these countries and it seems almost flat by comparison. The wide spread here represents significant differences that have huge impacts on people’s lives. Also, 1 minute * 261 work days a year * 40+ working years = 174 hours extra commute time per person. Thus, are talking well past 3,000 hours longer than the best country on this list. Or every walking hour for more than six months for the average working American over the average Portugal worker. So, I am not saying every EU country is doing ok, just by comparison it’s clear the US huge issues in this area.