3 ms·
DDG is supplanting labor intensive algorithmic improvements with manually manicured search results. Compared to Google's vast network of resources, it is a logi
by bryanh 16y ago
DDG is supplanting labor intensive algorithmic improvements with manually manicured search results. Compared to Google's vast network of resources, it is a logical step for DDG to take. It is, essentially, a fast fix to a real problem.
Google has to do things the hard (and dare I say... proper?) way.
- InfinityX0 16y agoDDG is supplanting labor intensive algorithmic improvements with manually manicured search results. This sentence is a paradox.
- mkramlich 16y agoTo illustrate what he meant, I'll give an example. Assume someone entered a search, "What are the best dog breeds?". Would it be easier to: 1. write an automated system which could dynamically deduce what the answer to this question is and/or what pages to return in the results, based on dynamically crawling the web, indexing, analying link structure, ranking, filtering, etc. -or- 2. have a human write an answer to this fricking question and enter it into the database as the result for this search hint: pick 2 it doesn't scale up to handle bazillions of different searches, but on a smaller scale and in tactical cases it's far simpler and easier to implement and can produce better results.
- bryanh 16y agoOf course by manicuring search results I mean blacklisting domains.