4 ms·

I would definitely pay for a service like this. It would be even more convenient if you handled billing for S3 for me while me still retaining ownership. I woul

I would definitely pay for a service like this. It would be even more convenient if you handled billing for S3 for me while me still retaining ownership. I would pay a premium on top of S3's services. It would also be neat if you could frame this as a Mozy or Backblaze for photos only... Emphasize storage rather than community like Flickr and Facebook do. I don't know if I'm your target demographic though: > Hobbyist photographer > Flickr Pro account user > 29 years old > Upload ~15-20 photos a month mostly because I use flickr as a showcase rather than storage > Shoot in RAW EDIT: Also... Please do not use a dark background. Or, if you do, please give users the option to customize the theme. Dark backgrounds are extremely irritating to me.

jmathai 16y ago
Yea, a Mozy for photos is a decent way of looking at it. I haven't even got to thinking of how the site would look but I presume it'd be theme-able and let you provide your own CSS if you wanted. I really don't want to dictate anything about your photos. I want to provide the utility of uploading/resizing etc. I do this for myself and after 6 years and a few thousand photos I realize how valuable it is. I also know that the chances that my kids will be able to see their photos is orders of magnitude higher than if I were uploading them to Facebook. Just want to spread the love :).