4 ms·
Idea is interesting. I don't think I would pay for the service, granted I'm not your target audience (I don't use flickr, photobucket, etc.). Also, I'd go with
by Jsarokin 16y ago
Idea is interesting. I don't think I would pay for the service, granted I'm not your target audience (I don't use flickr, photobucket, etc.).
Also, I'd go with $12-$24 a year instead of $1-$2 a month. Just looks nicer, and converts a lot better.
- atgm 16y agoUnless he went with $1.20 a month and pointed out that it's only 10 cents a month (echoes of Sprint's old 10 cents a minute ad). Then not only would he have a robust feature set to compete, but also a pricing advantage over Flickr.
- jmathai 16y agoI wasn't (yet) considering the "marketing" of the service. But at $1-2/month I was definitely intending to bill yearly.