> on behalf of — but not necessarily with the knowledge of — their clients I get that twitter has to cover its assets, but how likely is 5000 troll strong army

> on behalf of — but not necessarily with the knowledge of — their clients I get that twitter has to cover its assets, but how likely is 5000 troll strong army working on your behalf, as vocally as possible, and as a country with heavily monitored internet, not notice. The razor of fuzzy logic falls in the obvious place.