3 ms·
Is everything automatically generated with models now going to be classified as "Deepfake x"? A lot of news is now generated by bots, Bloomberg itself has 30%
by cmdshiftf4 7y ago
Is everything automatically generated with models now going to be classified as "Deepfake x"?
A lot of news is now generated by bots, Bloomberg itself has 30% of its content almost entirely generated [0], so does that render said news "Deepfake news"?
Or is it only when we're attempting to be alarmist?
[0]https://www.nytimes.com/2019/02/05/business/media/artificial-intelligence-journalism-robots.html https://www.nytimes.com/2019/02/05/business/media/artificial...
- Retric 7y agoIf Bloomberg marked their bot generated content as bot generated more people would skip it. As it is their willingness to do is why I don’t read their content.
- cmdshiftf4 7y ago>If Bloomberg marked their bot generated content as bot generated more people would skip it. What would make you believe that? If the content generated is of decent quality, timely and accurate (as of the time), why would people skip it?
- Retric 7y agoAssuming it’s of decent quality, timely and accurate is a huge stretch. The fact it’s not going to be those things is the issue.
- OGWhales 7y agoSeems like they just break down finical reports and the likes, which seems rather trivial. I don't read Bloomberg, so I may be mistaken, but that seems like an alright use case for automated articles.