> These aren't violent protests. I beg to differ. Protests in Delhi, Bengal, and UP are clearly violent. https://www.ndtv.com/india-news/hundreds-on-streets-o

> These aren't violent protests. I beg to differ. Protests in Delhi, Bengal, and UP are clearly violent. https://www.ndtv.com/india-news/hundreds-on-streets-of-old-delhi-to-protest-against-citizenship-act-2151984 https://www.ndtv.com/india-news/hundreds-on-streets-of-old-d... > Here's your proof: BJP, the ruling party, has been caught red-handed, like there were in 2002, https://thewire.in/communalism/murshidabad-bjp-lungi-skullca.. https://thewire.in/communalism/murshidabad-bjp-lungi-skullca.... This is from the article you shared: While speculation has been rife on social media on how BJP workers have been posing as anti-CAA protesters with the intention of turning the protests violent, this is the first noted case where police have taken action against someone for purportedly seeking to blame a particular community. There has been a lot of speculation on BJP's involvement in fanning violence. But it's not clear how much truth is there to it. I hope they are held accountable for whatever wrong they have done. And victims of riots (that happened in 1984, 2002 and other years) get their deserved justice. > The cognitive dissonance is strong. Could you be more specific about what you're trying to say here?