4 ms·
It is functionally better but far more brittle, over complicated, heavily coupled, stateful and poorly managed. The net gain is close to zero. Somewhere betwee
by m0xte 7y ago
It is functionally better but far more brittle, over complicated, heavily coupled, stateful and poorly managed.
The net gain is close to zero. Somewhere between sysv and systemd was the sweet spot.
Edit: I know my point is unpopular, perhaps mostly with RH staff browsing HN late at night, but this is experience from running systemd in production over 4 years on CentOS 7. What was not a concern before is now a concern and is actually costing me time, money and friction regularly. Add the Linux boot process, all the FreeDesktop crud to this and it's a nightmare of a system to look after. Windows/FreeBSD/OpenBSD are far far far easier to manage from this perspective.
- ClumsyPilot 7y ago> brittle and poorly managed Could you expand on that?
- m0xte 7y agoBrittle - try dealing with a hosed boot or DBus failure. I've dealt with numerous on CentOS 7 and at this point it's easier just to blow the whole node away and start again. Also I've had a couple of segfaults on journalctl recently when I actually need it so i have to then go digging through the GUID encrusted hell it leaves on disk. Poorly managed - Pwnie award, "it's not a bug" from Poettering etc etc.