I really liked GitHub's pipeline description file, but my issue with GH Actions was that the pipeline was slow. The same job running on the cheapest/slowest fre

I really liked GitHub's pipeline description file, but my issue with GH Actions was that the pipeline was slow. The same job running on the cheapest/slowest free-tier available Semaphore runner took half the time than on GitHub. That's with caching, parallelization on GH too. Otherwise it could be a good product, and I'd really like if I could manage the repos and the CI from one unified place