3 ms·

I have used this one for a few weeks, several months ago. At the time, there were 2 main issues: * The food selection was too US-centric - for example, where I

I have used this one for a few weeks, several months ago. At the time, there were 2 main issues: * The food selection was too US-centric - for example, where I live items like sausages tend to have a different nutritional content compared to their US counterparts. I think these types of food should have localised versions. * Weird portions once you select Metric: for example there were a lot of foods where the default quantity was 28.34 grams - I suspect because that's an ounce in the US.

papa_bear 7y ago
Thanks for the feedback! 1) This is true, we are pretty US centric at the moment. Most of our basic-food nutrition data comes from the USDA database, so that biases it a bit. We have some ideas for making it easier to localize the suggested foods, but it might be a little while before we get it in there. 2) We should probably round the numbers there a bit, but you're right, we just convert things like ounces to grams if you select metric units.