4 ms·
I‘m by no means an expert but I did some datacenter work. I wonder how this would be possible to install a beam splitter without disruption? Don’t you need to p
by rmetzler 7y ago
I‘m by no means an expert but I did some datacenter work. I wonder how this would be possible to install a beam splitter without disruption? Don’t you need to plug the fibers out, put the splitter in and then plug the fibers back in the splitter? I was searching YouTube but couldn’t find a video.
- Hikikomori 7y agoYou don't need a beam splitter to listen in on traffic.
- xvilka 7y agoThey bend the cables, thus allowing part of it be tracked with some residue light coming out of the fibre.
- rmetzler 7y agoI agree, this might be possible but I wonder how good the quality is then? A splitter will give you 50% light. That limits the length of the cable too, doesn’t it? How many errors will be there when you bend the cable and get maybe 15% light of encrypted traffic, and you can’t signal any retransmission?
- Kubuxu 7y agoOn run of the mill singlemode fiber loss is roughly 0.5dB/km. Splitting off half of the light (and you don't need half, much less is fine), would result in 3dB of loss. Fiber tramsreceivers automatically negotiate the power needed to sustain the link. So in case of datacenter or city networker, you could do a split-of without introducing too much loss and error rates. Trans-oceanic fibers are different beast but I guess someone figured it out.
- anonymfus 7y agoThe light is kept inside the fiber by the change in refraction index in the radial direction of the fiber so there is a total internal reflection. But if you bend the fiber enough then reflection is not total and part of the beam goes outside.