4 ms·
Thanks for sharing ! I'll stick to RLS for the time being, because I'd like to see it improved, but not replaced.
by Fiahil 7y ago
Thanks for sharing ! I'll stick to RLS for the time being, because I'd like to see it improved, but not replaced.
- dralley 7y agorust-analyzer is effectively RLS 2.0 -- rust-analyzer development happens on the official RLS 2.0 working group communication channels. Assuming they don't "replace" the RLS name, the most likely outcome is replacing large amounts of code en-masse with rust-analyzer code. https://rust-lang.github.io/compiler-team/working-groups/rls-2.0/#rust-analyzer https://rust-lang.github.io/compiler-team/working-groups/rls...