4 ms·
I've run substantial systems (200+ node operations) on OVH and it was completely unreliable. The hardware kept breaking down, the internal network was terrible,
by fooster 7y ago
I've run substantial systems (200+ node operations) on OVH and it was completely unreliable. The hardware kept breaking down, the internal network was terrible, and the support was terrible. Sometimes some backhoe would cut the network connection and cause a 12 hour outage (ok, over 3 years only twice). It was also was inelastic, and provisioning was slow. So if I needed new hardware there could be considerable lead time required.
We also tried Heztner, Linode and others. They were all bad in their own unique ways.
With AWS, and GCP, yes it is more expensive and also have their own set of problems but nowhere near the same scale as these other providers.
Yes if you are running a 1-2 machine setup, who cares. If you are running a professional organisation where you cannot reasonably have downtime without customers screaming, don't go for the cheap stuff.
- privateSFacct 7y agoThis - some of remember the MULTIPLE CONTROL PLANE takeovers at these third rate places. Seriously - root access on the control plane - that was then covered up. You really are going to build your business there? There is a reason AWS can charge the premium. I quickly learned my lession in linode at least!
- freedomben 7y agoI haven't used OVH a whole lot, but it's my go-to for small stuff because it's such a good value for the price. I have spun up a lot of instances on AWS and OVH now, and haven't noticed a speed difference. In fact OVH seem faster. Are you talking about VM instances or something else that takes a while to provision?