3 ms·
He means in the sense that the automobile killed the horse. And I agree, and was tweeting about exactly this yesterday. https://twitter.com/eric_wvgg/status/12
by Eric_WVGG 7y ago
He means in the sense that the automobile killed the horse.
And I agree, and was tweeting about exactly this yesterday. https://twitter.com/eric_wvgg/status/1207374861955469317 https://twitter.com/eric_wvgg/status/1207374861955469317
The problem isn’t that Google killed Reader, it’s that Reader got such traction to begin with. There were always better alternatives, and they’re still around and better than ever, but they aren’t doing anything to make RSS more accessible, user-friendly, or prevalent.
- blakesterz 7y agoI totally agree with your tweet there! It's waaaay too hard to figure out for most people. "There were always better alternatives" I always thought Reader was the best, I'm happy with NewsBlur, but Reader was great.
- timw4mail 7y agoWhat Google Reader also had was a good API, which let you sync what you read. I used Google Reader more through the API than in the web interface. With TinyTinyRSS and a plugin, I have similar functionality, but it still isn't quite as good as what Google had. That said, TinyTinyRSS has a better web interface than Google ever did.
- ocdtrekkie 7y agoMy experience with TTRSS's web interface isn't super positive (though I'm not using the latest version, in fairness), so that says something about Reader's interface.
- dsypa 7y agoWhat fast, free, information-dense, no-bullshit alternative was there to Reader?
- ymolodtsov 7y agoWhat's not friendly about Feedly, for instance? You don't have to know shit about RSS to use it.