It seems like what was said by Austin Clements was more of a bug report than it was a description of a solution for a bug. Which is the job of reporter and not

It seems like what was said by Austin Clements was more of a bug report than it was a description of a solution for a bug. Which is the job of reporter and not the person fixing the problem. In my mind, a commit message should not be the be all end all for what can be said about a particular bug fix. If someone needs to know the details then they can look at the diff and if the person who made the change feels it was complex enough then they should add a comment on the bug report about what was changed and how it was changed prior to marking the bug as *fixed.