3 ms·
When 9/11 happened, the predominant reaction worldwide was sympathy. Do you think that after all the subsequent actions of US government another similar event w
by praptak 7y ago
When 9/11 happened, the predominant reaction worldwide was sympathy. Do you think that after all the subsequent actions of US government another similar event would elicit a similar level of sympathy if it happened now?
- skissane 7y agoYes, I think if thousands of innocent people were murdered again, there would be more sympathy, and about the same amount. Most people are able to separate the actions of the US government from those of individual office workers, firefighters, plane passengers, etc, the vast majority of whom had effectively zero personal input into or responsibility for US government policy.
- buboard 7y agoyes, the terrorist attacks originate in places where the US has actively bombed/messed up. not because of objections to surveillance
- friendlybus 7y agoThe US has always done bad things. That's how you get so much quantity of stuff, but behind it all there are grains of good if you look. The reaction to 9/11 was interesting for most it was unpredictable and the day the US stopped being the untouchable top dog. It is easy to feel sympathy for an attack on home soil that had already delivered the aims of the aggressors who died in the attack, there were few loose threads. It became black and white. The fall of gwbush in that time period really degraded the faith in the rich old white guy. The belief it was all under control and we could blindly have faith that the great president has it all sorted was deeply undermined. That warm and free feeling from the 90s died on 9/11. As long as the next tragedy is just bad, I.e. incompetent or silly the US will be okay. If something truly evil comes out there's going to be trouble.