3 ms·
Unfortunately you still have to compile it from source instead of install an extension from the store, and there's no autoupdate. But the experience is vastly
by dralley 7y ago
Unfortunately you still have to compile it from source instead of install an extension from the store, and there's no autoupdate.
But the experience is vastly better. I deleted RLS immediately. And it's not that hard to install either.
- Waterluvian 7y agoThis is part of why I think I never discovered rust-analyzer. I first looked at what's most popular in the VSCode plugin library and found RLS. I then browser searched for alternatives and kept finding RLS. I think I concluded that RLS was all there was.
- rapsey 7y agoAnalyser runs at 400% cpu constantly for me.
- jayflux 7y agoHave you tried a recent build? They fixed a few issues around cpu usage over the past few months
- deleted 7y ago[deleted]
- Fiahil 7y agoThanks for sharing ! I'll stick to RLS for the time being, because I'd like to see it improved, but not replaced.
- dralley 7y agorust-analyzer is effectively RLS 2.0 -- rust-analyzer development happens on the official RLS 2.0 working group communication channels. Assuming they don't "replace" the RLS name, the most likely outcome is replacing large amounts of code en-masse with rust-analyzer code. https://rust-lang.github.io/compiler-team/working-groups/rls-2.0/#rust-analyzer https://rust-lang.github.io/compiler-team/working-groups/rls...