4 ms·
But there was this executive order? https://obamawhitehouse.archives.gov/the-press-office/2015/04/01/executive-order-blocking-property-certain-persons-engaging-
by post_break 7y ago
But there was this executive order? https://obamawhitehouse.archives.gov/the-press-office/2015/04/01/executive-order-blocking-property-certain-persons-engaging-significant-m https://obamawhitehouse.archives.gov/the-press-office/2015/0...
- A4ET8a8uTh0 7y agoOk. I am not an attorney. My views are my own. No purchase necessary. Not FDIC insured. YMMV. Consult a real lawyer. Don't be an idiot. You right in a sense that when you read this, Snowden could easily be argued to fit the mold. However, you will note that it later says that the actual designation ( verified here with treasury link I added ) is up to SOS and other involved individuals. Note, that at the time I checked it, Snowden was not on that list and apparently has not been since issuance of this EO. At least not yet. edit, because there always exceptions: see wikileaks and note neither he nor his creation was sanctioned by OFAC either. However, that did not stop the state from making donations.. challenging.