3 ms·
> Getting directions is simple. Even the author doesn't take issue with that specific functionality. Yes he does. You touch anything and state is erased. Don't
by normalnorm 7y ago
> Getting directions is simple. Even the author doesn't take issue with that specific functionality.
Yes he does. You touch anything and state is erased. Don't know exactly which one of the search results you want to go to? Tough shit, the interface works against you.
And still, getting directions used to be simpler. Now you have to decipher unlabeled hieroglyphs, and the interface keeps changing. You can't even get used to it. You are constantly being nudged to do shit that is not what you really want to do, such as "exploring your neighborhood".
> And I've never had an issue with Google maps hiding street names when there was ample room to show them, but if you're more than a little zoomed out, there isn't that room. Showing only major roads is a decent trade off, as is the mouse scroll wheel for zoom in/out.
Luck you, I guess. I have this problem all the time. A better trade off: if I searched for "Market Street", show that label! That would be a start. And frequently labels aren't shown even when there is plenty of space.
Oh, and why not show the scale of the map by default? Is this also a "power user" feature? I thought it was a crucial piece of information when reading a map...
> Or maybe it's my own failure of imagination: how would you improve in this particular area?
Easy. Revert to the interface circa 2010. It had none of the above problems.
- tmd83 7y agoExactly. It basically forces you to walk with the map open and not just do like 'keeping walking straight until you see road x'. Such a damming thing when you are walking 15-20 minutes to a place in a new city or even in an unknown area in your city.
- ineedasername 7y agoGranted, some good ideas.