2 ms·
Fundamentally, about half as efficient. You can compensate by cramming in seats closer or trying exotic designs. And there's some efficiency buy-back by operat
by Robotbeat 7y ago
Fundamentally, about half as efficient.
You can compensate by cramming in seats closer or trying exotic designs. And there's some efficiency buy-back by operating at higher altitudes where the engine can expand to lower pressures (and thus increase the pressure ratio), but overall, roughly half as efficient is a decent guesstimate.
Then again, conventional aircraft are about double the efficiency they used to be, so supersonic aircraft today could conceivably be approximately the same efficiency as transonic aircraft of yesteryear.
I think exotic designs could enable decent range low supersonic electric flight (i.e. Mach 1.5 or something). Going to need good batteries, though, and extremely high aspect ratio wings.
- blackflame 7y agoA lot of the fuel efficiency of modern aircraft comes from having giant turbofans instead of turbojets. By attaching a giant fan the front of your compressor and redirecting most of the air around the engine you can get great efficiency at subsonic speeds. However, the nature of the fan has fundamental limitations when approaching the speed of sound and turbo/ram jets are basically just pouring gas in a tube of precompressed air.