3 ms·
A lot of people argue that "consensual murder" (a.k.a. euthanasia) should be legal (with the appropriate safeguards to prevent abuse). Edit: Actually I retract
by tomp 7y ago
A lot of people argue that "consensual murder" (a.k.a. euthanasia) should be legal (with the appropriate safeguards to prevent abuse).
Edit: Actually I retract this comment. You bring an interesting point, and shouldn't be downvoted. I guess the argument "to prevent abuse" includes "to prevent people from exchanging their lives for money". And you could say the same for sex - people should be able to choose to have sex / be murdered / donate their organs, but shouldn't be able to exchange that for money.
I guess the counterargument would be, that the exact definition of "exchange" depends on whether you're actually giving something - arguably, you're giving up your life / kidney (and most people aren't willing to give that up, regardless of whether they're being paid or not), but not necessarily giving up sex (and many people are giving it up pretty often... the only difference is, are they also getting paid for it, or not).
- stef25 7y agoEuthanasia doesn't fit the description of consensual murder. I'm not sure how ... I guess euthanasia is more of a medical procedure. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Consensual_homicide https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Consensual_homicide
- jandrese 7y agoIt is exactly how opponents of euthanasia frame the debate, so it is not surprising that the GP was confused.
- brutt 7y agoFreezing of patient for far future is medical procedure (with very little chance of success). Euthanasia is suicide done because of necessity. Result is same in both cases — patient is dead and suffering no pain, but they are very different procedures because freezing leaves room for hope, while euthanasia doesn't.