3 ms·

I have no idea why you're getting downvoted. Supplying actual data is always useful. Especially when it contradicts a common opinion ;)

• TeMPOraL 7y ago
  Supplying actual data is always useful. If only that article did that :). Sometimes, articles that contradict a common opinion do so because they're simply dead wrong. This is one of those cases.
  • marcus_holmes 7y ago
    I'll admit it's not much data, and there doesn't appear to be a source. But it vaguely refers to a study, and doesn't just reflect the authors preferences. Did Apple do a study? Did it come to the conclusion that the mouse was faster? If so, why is it dead wrong?
    • TeMPOraL 7y ago
      I don't know if Apple did a study, and I'm not particularly inclined to look hard for it, because the argumentation from the article series itself is pretty much bogus and uses some weird test setups (like https://www.asktog.com/SunWorldColumns/S02KeyboardVMouse3.html https://www.asktog.com/SunWorldColumns/S02KeyboardVMouse3.ht... and the e -> | replacement game); that, coupled with my real-world experience which every day proves superiority of keyboard over mouse in structured interfaces, leads me to assign very low prior to the validity of the conclusion of that Apple study, as reported by Tog. (The study perhaps had a more narrow set of conclusions than presented in the article. Wouldn't surprise me.)