4 ms·
Your question presupposes that there is significant doubt about the existence of Jesus. I am fairly confident that the historical person existed. I am also fair
by goodcanadian 7y ago
Your question presupposes that there is significant doubt about the existence of Jesus. I am fairly confident that the historical person existed. I am also fairly confident that many of the stories about him are invented or at least, greatly exaggerated. The same applies to Buddha; however, a sibling comment answered much better than I.
- throwaway38235 7y agoThere is significant doubt about the existence of Jesus. The historical records are less than scarce.
- soufron 7y agoGiven that there are no historical proofs of the existence of Jesus - especially nothing contemporary, it's a legitimate question.
- joveian 7y agoThis is just wrong, there are contemporary sources. Here is a short overview: https://www.theguardian.com/world/2017/apr/14/what-is-the-historical-evidence-that-jesus-christ-lived-and-died https://www.theguardian.com/world/2017/apr/14/what-is-the-hi...