I would Swift is more complex than Haskell, though much more familiar to many programmers. Pure Haskell is pretty simple, all in all. Maybe using it isn’t, give

I would Swift is more complex than Haskell, though much more familiar to many programmers. Pure Haskell is pretty simple, all in all. Maybe using it isn’t, given the ecosystem ;-) Swift and Rust are definitely similar in complexity, but Rust actually merits most of its complexity imo. It gives strong guarantees and a strong foundation for the future; I don’t believe that Swift has that. Swift adds a lot of features for the sake of having them, and I think that will catch up with the language quickly (see C++.)