> The look and feel of the book do not impress the user as being scholarly. By scholarly we mean weighty. Not superficial. Chock-full of erudition. This seems

> The look and feel of the book do not impress the user as being scholarly. By scholarly we mean weighty. Not superficial. Chock-full of erudition. This seems like a bizarrely out-of-place jab in an essay with an otherwise scholarly tone. Why should the “look and feel” of the texts used matter to the facts of a case? If the publisher had used thicker paper or a nicer font would Scalia have been less inclined to criticize the appellate judge?