2 ms·
Bayesianism suggests you to derive your decision from squared amplitudes, MWI provides you the same numbers 0.75 and 0.25, you can use them as usual. This doesn
by GoblinSlayer 7y ago
Bayesianism suggests you to derive your decision from squared amplitudes, MWI provides you the same numbers 0.75 and 0.25, you can use them as usual. This doesn't look specific to quantum mechanics, how does it work with other deterministic systems, like casino? Also bayesianism predates quantum mechanics.
- repsilat 7y agoSorry, I thought your original post was meant to address my original point. I said that the Born Rule (the association between squared amplitudes and subjective probabilities) isn't intuitive in MWI, and I thought you said "It makes sense because of Bayesianism." Does it provide a deductive argument for using the squared amplitude? Or does it just make use of the same empirical evidence everyone else uses, and actually not provide any explanatory power?