4 ms·
They also said it wasn't during work hours or on googles equipment. Though, honestly, I doubt I really even agree on the equipment clause when it. When said e
by ownagefool 7y ago
They also said it wasn't during work hours or on googles equipment.
Though, honestly, I doubt I really even agree on the equipment clause when it. When said equipment is a laptop and a phone, using their device would be more about not wanting to carry multiple devices than any interstice value gained by the equipment.
- mamon 7y agoI think this restriction makes more sense in other industries, such as pharmaceuticals, where lab equipment can cost millions of dollars, so employee doing their own "side projects" on it is more real abuse of company property.
- ownagefool 7y agoI'd typically agree, there is a solid argument there and the premise as a whole makes sense, I just think trivialities should be excluded, and that standard software development is fairly trivial use. Once you test such software against company owned datasets, it's a different ballgame.