4 ms·

> Pakistan, Non-Muslim population fell from 23% to 3%. This is a straight up propaganda and an outright lie [0]. The population of non-Muslims in Pakistan has

> Pakistan, Non-Muslim population fell from 23% to 3%. This is a straight up propaganda and an outright lie [0]. The population of non-Muslims in Pakistan has always hovered around 3.5%. Census 1951 - 3.4% non-Muslims (oldest) Census 1998 - 3.7% non-Muslims (newest) [0]https://www.indiatoday.in/india/story/pakistan-bangladesh-non-muslim-population-citizenship-amendment-bill-bjp-1627678-2019-12-12 https://www.indiatoday.in/india/story/pakistan-bangladesh-no...

orbifold 7y ago
There was mass forced migration when the partition happened, so there might have lived more than 23% non-Muslims on Pakistan’s territory before.
- denzil_correa 7y ago
  Certainly, that can’t be used as an argument against persecution of non Muslims - the country didn’t even exist then!
  - timbuck2 7y ago
    It can, because Jinnah himself had assured all minorities of Pakistan the safety. AFTER partition, the rioting mobs killed and drove out Hindus, later Ahmadiyyas, and more recently Christians.
    - ninni 7y ago
      Just goes to show you the importance of secularism and it's need to be bastioned. Using the same protected grounds under which people seek asylum, to discriminate is inherently unprincipled. All things being equal, non muslims may well have more pressing claims to refugee protections. The merits and priority of a migrants application can be determined without destroying India's secular fabric.
cmonnow 7y ago
Pakistan includes both West Pakistan (currently Pakistan) and East Pakistan (currently Bangladesh)- based on 1947 partiton, until 1971 when India helped Bangladesh gain independence from Pakistan. Both 'Pakistans' had a responsibility to protect minorities as per Nehru - Liaqat pact, and they both failed. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Religious_discrimination_in_Pakistan https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Religious_discrimination_in_Pa... https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Freedom_of_religion_in_Bangladesh#Persecution https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Freedom_of_religion_in_Banglad...
- kamaal 7y ago
  The fact like people like you exist, suggests India has failed as well.

orbifold 7y ago

There was mass forced migration when the partition happened, so there might have lived more than 23% non-Muslims on Pakistan’s territory before.

denzil_correa 7y ago
Certainly, that can’t be used as an argument against persecution of non Muslims - the country didn’t even exist then!
- timbuck2 7y ago
  It can, because Jinnah himself had assured all minorities of Pakistan the safety. AFTER partition, the rioting mobs killed and drove out Hindus, later Ahmadiyyas, and more recently Christians.
  - ninni 7y ago
    Just goes to show you the importance of secularism and it's need to be bastioned. Using the same protected grounds under which people seek asylum, to discriminate is inherently unprincipled. All things being equal, non muslims may well have more pressing claims to refugee protections. The merits and priority of a migrants application can be determined without destroying India's secular fabric.

cmonnow 7y ago

Pakistan includes both West Pakistan (currently Pakistan) and East Pakistan (currently Bangladesh)- based on 1947 partiton, until 1971 when India helped Bangladesh gain independence from Pakistan. Both 'Pakistans' had a responsibility to protect minorities as per Nehru - Liaqat pact, and they both failed. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Religious_discrimination_in_Pakistan https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Religious_discrimination_in_Pa... https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Freedom_of_religion_in_Bangladesh#Persecution https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Freedom_of_religion_in_Banglad...

kamaal 7y ago
The fact like people like you exist, suggests India has failed as well.