Looking at the user, I think it's fair to say that this is a (fairly well-executed) troll. One post since registration, and all you'd need is two sock-puppets i

Looking at the user, I think it's fair to say that this is a (fairly well-executed) troll. One post since registration, and all you'd need is two sock-puppets in rapid succession to push it onto the front page. I have to say, I've been wondering why this hasn't happened sooner. It's worked for spam, with only a couple of upvotes per article. Why not trolling? Incidentally - and I want to say this very carefully - I believe it should not be out of bounds to examine, for example, the influence of genetic heredity as opposed to environment upon various societal issues. I'm largely discounting this article as a troll based on wild-eyed paranoid claims and red-baiting, rather than claiming enough of a knowledge of the subject to rebut every single one of its claims. (Although if there is, say, an equivalent to talk.origins on this subject, I'd be interested to see it.) EDIT: Okay, make that "paranoid claims, red-baiting and rejecting 'mainstream science' as conspiracy". Yeah, I'd call that a troll.