4 ms·
Why not? There are people who are more familiar with Rust than C/C++, why shouldn't they use a more familiar language?
by cttet 7y ago
Why not? There are people who are more familiar with Rust than C/C++, why shouldn't they use a more familiar language?
- baq 7y agoat that point you're getting the worst of both worlds: no safety guarantees and a very complex language.
- paavohtl 7y agoUnsafe Rust has significantly more safety guarantees than C or C++. It doesn't disable the type system, bounds checking, ownership tracking or borrow checking.
- CaptainMarvel 7y agoWhat does Unsafe Rust disable then?
- steveklabnik 7y agoIt does not disable, it enables. Unsafe doesn't turn anything off, it adds new capabilities instead. https://doc.rust-lang.org/nomicon/what-unsafe-does.html https://doc.rust-lang.org/nomicon/what-unsafe-does.html