4 ms·
It won't be better for them. It may not better for their children. It will probably be better for their grandchildren... if we continue to be generous. But b
by dkarl 16y ago
It won't be better for them. It may not better for their children. It will probably be better for their grandchildren... if we continue to be generous. But by that time we'll probably be disgusted and resentful because they haven't assimilated well enough to be productive members of the middle class. The alternative, of course, is forcible assimilation and cultural extinction, which would be a horrific fate inflicted on two generations for the sake of unborn ones.
To accomplish what you suggest, it seems like the "cleanest" and most humane way would be to kidnap every child under ten and every subsequent child born into the tribe and put them up (separately) for adoption in wealthy countries. Let everyone older than ten live out their lives undisturbed, except for the tragic disappearance of all of their children. I challenge you to either endorse this method or describe a way that causes less suffering.