4 ms·
What about the confidence in the result? Math is never done willy nilly, and without the ability to show how it is done, this will go no where. That said, this
by abc_lisper 7y ago
What about the confidence in the result? Math is never done willy nilly, and without the ability to show how it is done, this will go no where. That said, this is a exciting result
- colejohnson66 7y agoThat reminds me of a joke that goes something like this: > Me: What is 2+2? > AI: It’s 42. > Me: Wrong, it’s 4. What’s 2+3? > AI: It’s 4.
- julienreszka 7y agoCan someone explain me the joke
- ct0 7y agoThe ai was trained that the answer is 4, so the second time around it went with 4.
- colejohnson66 7y agoAI (or more accurately, machine learning (ML)) learns by being told when it’s wrong and right (like a child). The AI makes a mistake on what 2+2 is, so it’s corrected. However, when it’s asked 2+3, it doesn’t know that 3 is one more than 2, and the only answer it’s learned is 4, so it says 4.
- perl4ever 7y agoAs is well known, a child learning language will often initially assume that rules/patterns are more regular that they actually are.
- Someone 7y agoIn general, differentiating a function is a lot easier than integrating one. Because functions can be written in multiple ways (simple example: ‘x+1’ vs ‘1+x’. For harder examples, see for example https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_trigonometric_identities https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_trigonometric_identiti...), it may still be difficult to prove that the derivative of a proposed integral of some function f is equal to f, but most of the time, checking a proposed solution to ".