3 ms·
Sure. Clearly the portfolio adviser, who used his name no less and did not stay anonymous, doesn't have as much visibility to their charitable works managing
by supercanuck 7y ago
Sure.
Clearly the portfolio adviser, who used his name no less and did not stay anonymous, doesn't have as much visibility to their charitable works managing a 100B portfolio as say you do bookkeeping for your local ward.
- jjeaff 7y agoI wasn't taking issue with the apparent $100B in assets that are being held on to rather than spent. Merely stating something that essentially every Mormon knows and can be easily verified but was left out. It's not really a pertinent fact to this issue of a huge investment fund. Except for the apparent editorial by the reporter that members are asked to pay tithing even when they can't afford it, which is misleading.
- deleted 7y ago[deleted]
- supercanuck 7y agoYou leave a lot of details out. One does not just “not tithe” if they are poor in the Mormon religion.