4 ms·
> Which is to say the significant majority of all rifles. So straight forward but not sane, because it would be enormous overreach rather than anything that cou
by CompanionCuuube 7y ago
> Which is to say the significant majority of all rifles. So straight forward but not sane, because it would be enormous overreach rather than anything that could actually pass or survive judicial review.
I'm amused that this is an actual argument. "We're not idiots who don't understand guns, if we had our way we would have had a ban for an overreaching category of firearms!"
- tptacek 7y agoIt's easy to win arguments when you make them up yourself to knock down. That comment is responding to and inaccurately paraphrasing me. I'm right here. I suggest you rebut something I actually said.
- CompanionCuuube 7y agoNot inaccurate: > The original AWB proposals were sane and straightforward: they intended to regulate any semi-automatic long gun with a detachable magazine.
- tptacek 7y agoIt's interesting to see you write as if the very words in your quotation aren't there to compare with how you paraphrased them. A bold choice!
- CompanionCuuube 7y agoBeing truthful is not bold. Or maybe it is from your standpoint. If you don't think that the category of semiautomatic longguns that have detachable magazines is not overreaching, then more power to you. Sorry, I mean bless your heart as they might say in the South.