Apparently Google was already doing this with other sites. Why is this one different? It wasn't like she put up something that was illegal or could increase Goo

Apparently Google was already doing this with other sites. Why is this one different? It wasn't like she put up something that was illegal or could increase Google's liability. It's one thing to say: "Hey we don't like that one, change it." It's another to fire someone when they engage in a protected activity. If she had put it up and refused to take it down I could understand firing her. But this is suspect for sure.