3 ms·
I strongly oppose public unions. Unions are good for private companies, as there is a balance of powers - if the owners pay employees too little, employees qui
by tomp 7y ago
I strongly oppose public unions.
Unions are good for private companies, as there is a balance of powers - if the owners pay employees too little, employees quit, whereas if the employees protest too much, the company doesn't sell anything - both scenarios lead to collapse / bankrupcy, so both sides are motivated to cooperate and find a compromise.
In public services, there is no such balance - the state isn't constrained by market forces, and it won't collapse no matter how much employees protest. In addition, state employment usually comes with other benefits (e.g. job & pension security), so really the employees shouldn't be complaining and holding the whole country hostage.
- merpnderp 7y ago"...The very nature and purposes of Government make it impossible for administrative officials to represent fully or to bind the employer in mutual discussions with Government employee organizations. The employer is the whole people, who speak by means of laws enacted by their representatives in Congress. Accordingly, administrative officials and employees alike are governed and guided, and in many instances restricted, by laws which establish policies, procedures, or rules in personnel matters." -FDR Letter on the Resolution of Federation of Federal Employees Against Strikes in Federal Service I think we've seen this play out in how public unions now dominate policy discussions putting the public good as an often secondary consideration.