3 ms·
The article is confusing. She says she was fired for doing one thing. Google says she did something else (modified Chromium without permission). Does she deny t
by Touche 7y ago
The article is confusing. She says she was fired for doing one thing. Google says she did something else (modified Chromium without permission). Does she deny their claims, or is her statement just spin? Given just her quotes you would think that she was fired for literally telling coworkers that they have a right to organize.
- iwantagrinder 7y agoDid you not read the part where she did, where she followed the process by the book and it was approved? Or did you just have your mind made up to decide to side with Google instead?
- Touche 7y agoNope, I am not siding with Google, if you'll see my other comments in this thread. It's just not super clear to me that there's agreement on what actually happened here.
- PunchTornado 7y agoDo you understand that you can follow the process by the book and still do something wrong and be rightfully fired? "The book" doesn't contain everything that an employee shouldn't or should do. Sending political messages thorugh a browser extension to other employees seems like a reason for being fired no matter how many reviews you've got.
- kawfey 7y agothat's the problem with seeing one side of the story, and the other side being a megacorporation which will never explain the firing more than "abusing privileges."