Perhaps all forms of randomness are pseudorandomness of various quality levels, which turns out to be good enough? It would be the end of the current interpret

Perhaps all forms of randomness are pseudorandomness of various quality levels, which turns out to be good enough? It would be the end of the current interpretation of what science means, but the process and results of science could carry on as they always have. There is also the glimmer of post-science, in which we might be able to find a process/method that is more effective/efficient than the scientific in some domains. And you’re right — there will certainly be wailing and gnashing of teeth. :-)