4 ms·
This is true, but containers are so much better than nothing and relatively simple to use, so if someone isn't going to put in the effort for a more secure solu
by thenewnewguy 7y ago
This is true, but containers are so much better than nothing and relatively simple to use, so if someone isn't going to put in the effort for a more secure solution I'd rather they use Docker than nothing.
- t0astbread 7y agoAre containers simpler to automate from a service provider's POV than, say KVM or qemu or Firecracker (or other VM tech)?
- olalonde 7y agoYes, Docker largely became popular because of its user friendliness. Running a containerized compile job can be quickly done in a single command (e.g. docker run --rm -v "$(pwd):/src" -t ownyourbits/mmake).
- vsareto 7y agoWe haven't lost the effort in securing bare metal systems. Those still work.