Argh. Reading the announced paper on arxiv https://arxiv.org/abs/1912.06462 https://arxiv.org/abs/1912.06462 In the introduction: "Most importantly, we will di

Argh. Reading the announced paper on arxiv https://arxiv.org/abs/1912.06462 https://arxiv.org/abs/1912.06462 In the introduction: "Most importantly, we will discuss how it may be possible to test this hypothesis in an (almost) model independent way." Most. Importantly. Then in the paper, under "Experimental Test": "This means concretely that one should make measurements on states prepared as identically as possible with devices as small and cool as possible in time-increments as small as possible. This consideration does not change much if one believes the hidden variables are properties of the particle after all. In this case, however, the problem is that preparing almost identical initial states is impossible since we do not know how to reproduce the particle’s hidden variables. One can then try to make repeated measurements of non-commuting observables on the same states, as previously laid out in [36]." And finally: "[36] S. Hossenfelder, “Testing super-deterministic hidden variables theories,” Found. Phys. 41, 1521 (2011) [arXiv:1105.4326 [quant-ph]]." So after the "most" qualified introduction, eventually just a reference to her 2011 paper. "Most importantly" "good" ... joke?