4 ms·
That's not true though... He says right there, the fraudulent payroll payments were many times the normal amount and not part of the normal cycle. In fact, fr
by BoorishBears 7y ago
That's not true though...
He says right there, the fraudulent payroll payments were many times the normal amount and not part of the normal cycle.
In fact, from what he described, even the bank would have picked up on the fraudulent transactions upon human review.
Small businesses are not going to confuse out-of-cycle payroll payments with normal ones, cash flow is way too tight for mistakes like that.
-
I'm also not saying it's unreasonable to be suspicious of the call, but after that initial suspicion, it's unreasonable not to hang up immediately on the scammer... then make a "sanity call" to bank/payroll processor/both
- perl4ever 7y agoThis is like asking why people crash planes when one of their instruments is telling them bad information and the others are all working fine. Once you know something important isn't trustworthy, it's easy and likely to become very disoriented as to what you can trust. This is why people reflexively doubt anything particularly out of the ordinary - it might rarely be wrong, but it's far better than becoming paranoid at every drop of a hat.