4 ms·
So? What are we supposed to take away from that? They have more numbers? That doesn't extrapolate to better products or better anything.
by sigzero 16y ago
So? What are we supposed to take away from that? They have more numbers? That doesn't extrapolate to better products or better anything.
- RyanDScott 16y ago>That doesn't extrapolate to better products or better anything. Agreed. So maybe we should be asking how Apple is growing faster than Nokia with fewer resources?
- pavlov 16y agoNokia suffers from the mythical man-month. They've only recently discovered that throwing 6,000 engineers at Symbian didn't make it better.
- fdghjkh 16y agoBut to be fair - they have now hired another 6000 HR managers to work out why not
- xenophanes 16y agoThat's not very fair :-)
- fdghjkh 16y agoDon't worry they have set up a series of "Strategy Boutiques" (seriously!) to get over it http://www.slideshare.net/whatidiscover/open-innovation-in-a-large-enterprise http://www.slideshare.net/whatidiscover/open-innovation-in-a...
- Isamu 16y agoI don't think this article is praise for Nokia, quite the opposite. They are saying that Apple is much more efficient. More to the point, Nokia is losing profit compared to Apple: http://www.google.com/finance?q=NYSE:NOK&fstype=ii http://www.google.com/finance?q=NYSE:NOK&fstype=ii http://www.google.com/finance?q=NASDAQ:AAPL&fstype=ii http://www.google.com/finance?q=NASDAQ:AAPL&fstype=ii so measuring efficiency as net income per employee the contrast is more stark.