2 ms·
1) I ask why this applies to most industries 2) You point out it applies to FAANG 3) I say FAANG isn't most industries 4) You say most industries must only i
by OnlineGladiator 7y ago
1) I ask why this applies to most industries
2) You point out it applies to FAANG
3) I say FAANG isn't most industries
4) You say most industries must only include those better than the S&P 500
5) I point out a flaw in your reasoning
6) You insist you are right, upset that I tried to ask a question
7) I summarize what happened and exit this thread
- account73466 7y ago"1) I ask why this applies to most industries 2) You point out it applies to FAANG" That is a lie because I said "often" in "You see that from papers published at top ML conferences. Top contributors are often from FAANG. Some papers are clearly applications." without saying that FAANG = most industries. Instead, I said you can see that from these conferences. Thus, you made it up. "4) You say most industries must only include those better than the S&P 500" That is a lie. I didn't say that. I said "If you find no paper from that company, chances are high their stock price is not beating S&P 500 over the last 5 years." I only mentioned a correlation and said nothing about your "most industries". You misinterpret the text. Fortunately, the text is written so it was easy to prove you are liar, boy.