> That's not an argument. Any regressive policy could and has been justified in those terms. Yes, it is. The US government has an institutional history of ove

> That's not an argument. Any regressive policy could and has been justified in those terms. Yes, it is. The US government has an institutional history of overseeing ICAAN, so it's the most practical organization to take on that role on short notice. I think you're letting the perfect be the enemy of the good. Your preferred multi-national solution would likely take years to negotiate, which means it's not really even a solution at all, as far as .org is concerned.