>That it makes a company liable in case someone repairs their truck and it blows up, since they can't prove that the two were related. Also to consider: the mac

>That it makes a company liable in case someone repairs their truck and it blows up, since they can't prove that the two were related. Also to consider: the machine blows up after a repair, but it's not related to that. Wouldn't this situation be analogous to the automobile industry? Surely this issue has been spoken on in the courts.