2 ms·
I'm a little tired of pointless Java rants so I won't comment on the thing. I did find one thing in the article that I think is good advice to anyone using any
by st3fan 18y ago
I'm a little tired of pointless Java rants so I won't comment on the thing. I did find one thing in the article that I think is good advice to anyone using any random platform or language:
"If the language doesn't have the particular feature, there is nothing preventing you from using a combination of general purpose languages in your architecture."
S.
- berlinbrown 18y agoI didn't think it was THAT pointless. And I didn't mean for it to be an anti Java post. In fact, I was really targeting the "Software" developers that will only consider working with one general purpose language. I even see developers not even taking the time to work with scripting languages like python, perl, or ruby for basic tasks and have to fall back on Java. "random platform or language". I didn't think the languages I mentioned were random. Most of them mentioned are mature and have a rich set of libraries especially for small or medium sized applications. Plus, I was trying to comment on "Java is the new COBOL" as opposed to selling other languages. I actually may try to do that in "Part 2".