3 ms·
Those secular places have high taxes and social services, which is secular charity. Mississippi and Alabama need religious services because religious people su
by lonelappde 7y ago
Those secular places have high taxes and social services, which is secular charity.
Mississippi and Alabama need religious services because religious people suffocated the government. I'd much rather be poor in San Francisco and enjoying public services than be poor in Mississippi hoping for religious services.
- kortilla 7y ago> Those secular places have high taxes and social services, which is secular charity. It’s not really voluntary, which brings in the question of if it’s really charity. > I'd much rather be poor in San Francisco and enjoying public services than be poor in Mississippi hoping for religious services Which public services do you think SF has that aren’t available in Mississippi? I think you’ll find that the real difference is tolerance of homelessness in general and programs that allow continued drug use while receiving benefits.
- pcwalton 7y ago> Which public services do you think SF has that aren’t available in Mississippi? Medicaid expansion.
- albertop 7y agoIt is not a charity if you are coerced to pay for it.
- deleted 7y ago[deleted]